Effectiveness of the hull ball-mounted MG and the co-axial MG

How effective is the hull ball-mount machine guns and co-axial machine guns of a tank?

Besides self-defence, are these effective anti-infantry tools?

Views: 145

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The coax is very effective. The .50 cal on the M1 is very lethal not only in terms of killing effect but in terms of sheer suppression and terror.
The co-axial does kill then and not merely suppress?

I don't dispute the effectiveness of the pintle-mounted MG. What of the hull-MGs? It seems to be a common feature in tanks in the Second World War but it has practically disappeared today.
Boresighting - I don't know how they boresighted in WW II for mg's - Tony?
Stumbled on this... But wasn't one of the key weaknesses of the Ferdinand the lack of a bow gun (keep the "flys" way).

The Merkava has several hull MG's cause in an urban environment they are very effective - maybe the lack of a bow gun in the M1 is a Cold War remnant and is a now a design "flaw" for the asymetric warfare environment (gotta like big words) .

RSS

Help Center

Latest Activity

Joseph replied to Chuang Shyue Chou's discussion What are you reading?
"Read: "Islands of Destiny: The Solomons Campaign and the Eclipse of the Rising Sun" by…"
8 hours ago
George Nap is now a member of ConsimWorld
Tuesday
bob pryce commented on bob pryce's photo
Thumbnail

Total War

"I used that as starting point but felt that there was a lot of different units as time went on"
Monday
Bob DeSilva updated their profile
Monday
Steve Brown commented on bob pryce's photo
Thumbnail

Total War

"Did you rule out the OB from Fire in the East?"
Monday
bob pryce posted photos
Monday
Frank Morehouse updated their profile
Sunday
Jeffrey Mayer posted photos
Sunday

Groups

Members

CSW Related Links

Please be sure to check-out these CSW services.

© 2017   Created by John Kranz.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service