OCS Guderians Blitzkrieg II vs GMT's Barbarossa Series

I was just wondering the advantages and disadvantages of both games. I was interested in buying one of these games and not sure which one I would enjoy more. All feedback will be appreciated. Thank you.

Views: 712

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I just finished a game of GBII,  Typhoon. Its a great game.  Its also currently up for pre-order and has gone to the printers. It should be available in June.

I like them both, but OCS better. 

 

IMHO, OCS plays faster and I prefer the greater emphasis on logistics.  EFS has logistics, but it is simplified and I prefer the greater complexity/realism of the OCS supply model.  I also prefer the OCS "surprise" effect on combat (it's not really surprise, but local tactical vagaries).  It creates a more realistic uncertainty during combat.  EFS KtR feels rather scripted, and all the EFS battles occur in 1941 so the Soviet is quite hamstrung operationally.  OCS Case Blue and Baltic Gap, on the other hand, models periods during which the Reds were ascendant.  Plus you get Burma and Sicily and Korea and Tunisia and the whole DAK2 enchilada, which is probably my favorite game.

 

On the plus side for EFS, I like the air rules a little better.  I also like the way EFS Crimea models the naval activity.  Very narrative and thrilling, and it creates a lot of fun decisions.  Bottom line is both systems are good, but OCS has more variety, more fluid decision-making, and better logistics.

 

EFS players, please do not shell me.  Just my opinion.  :-)

Ocs, the developers keep up with erratta. With EFS you have to go thru hundreds of posts to see what has been corrected. OCS, the surprise factor is kind of ridiculous. My opponent had an 8-1 attack reduced to a 5-1 or 4-1, had surprise go against him and lost everything, how often does this happen in real life?  Air rules are better in EFS and supply is easier to learn. This is not just my opinion but others in my game club.

 

You dont realize ground and position its paramount in OCS. It matters very much less final result in the combat table if you are defending or attacking with a good position.

 

From the worst result to the better in the CRT  your direct losses are only 2 steps (1-4 with a 1 dice roll, or 13-1 with a 15 dice roll), either AL2, or DL2o3DG.

 

It means that your "lost everything" in fact is as much 2 steps if your position was good.

 

In war shit happens, and there are plenty of WWII operational accounts where tactical bad coordination between battallions or regiments, tactical ambushes, etc. lead to a disaster to lead units, stopping cold following units. Surprise deals with that.

RSS

Help Center

Latest Activity

Andy Loakes posted a status
"LYG July Update Complete You can find it here: www.limeyyankgames.co.uk"
19 hours ago
Adrien Lamothe updated their profile
yesterday
David Wilkinson left a comment for Eric Walters
"Hi Eric Thanks for the warm welcome . Getting more time to enjoy my favorite hobby of wargaming…"
yesterday
Joseph replied to Chuang Shyue Chou's discussion What are you reading?
"Read: "Masters of the Battlefield: Great Commanders From The Classical Age To The Napoleonic…"
Thursday
Eric Walters commented on Ian Schofield's photo
Thursday
Ian Schofield posted a photo
Thursday
Eric Walters left a comment for David Wilkinson
"Welcome to the Consimworld Social Website, David!  And a belated welcome back to the wargaming…"
Wednesday
David Wilkinson is now a member of ConsimWorld
Wednesday

Groups

Events

Members

CSW Related Links

© 2020   Created by John Kranz.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service