OCS Guderians Blitzkrieg II vs GMT's Barbarossa Series

I was just wondering the advantages and disadvantages of both games. I was interested in buying one of these games and not sure which one I would enjoy more. All feedback will be appreciated. Thank you.

Views: 641

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I just finished a game of GBII,  Typhoon. Its a great game.  Its also currently up for pre-order and has gone to the printers. It should be available in June.

I like them both, but OCS better. 

 

IMHO, OCS plays faster and I prefer the greater emphasis on logistics.  EFS has logistics, but it is simplified and I prefer the greater complexity/realism of the OCS supply model.  I also prefer the OCS "surprise" effect on combat (it's not really surprise, but local tactical vagaries).  It creates a more realistic uncertainty during combat.  EFS KtR feels rather scripted, and all the EFS battles occur in 1941 so the Soviet is quite hamstrung operationally.  OCS Case Blue and Baltic Gap, on the other hand, models periods during which the Reds were ascendant.  Plus you get Burma and Sicily and Korea and Tunisia and the whole DAK2 enchilada, which is probably my favorite game.

 

On the plus side for EFS, I like the air rules a little better.  I also like the way EFS Crimea models the naval activity.  Very narrative and thrilling, and it creates a lot of fun decisions.  Bottom line is both systems are good, but OCS has more variety, more fluid decision-making, and better logistics.

 

EFS players, please do not shell me.  Just my opinion.  :-)

Ocs, the developers keep up with erratta. With EFS you have to go thru hundreds of posts to see what has been corrected. OCS, the surprise factor is kind of ridiculous. My opponent had an 8-1 attack reduced to a 5-1 or 4-1, had surprise go against him and lost everything, how often does this happen in real life?  Air rules are better in EFS and supply is easier to learn. This is not just my opinion but others in my game club.

 

You dont realize ground and position its paramount in OCS. It matters very much less final result in the combat table if you are defending or attacking with a good position.

 

From the worst result to the better in the CRT  your direct losses are only 2 steps (1-4 with a 1 dice roll, or 13-1 with a 15 dice roll), either AL2, or DL2o3DG.

 

It means that your "lost everything" in fact is as much 2 steps if your position was good.

 

In war shit happens, and there are plenty of WWII operational accounts where tactical bad coordination between battallions or regiments, tactical ambushes, etc. lead to a disaster to lead units, stopping cold following units. Surprise deals with that.

RSS

Help Center

Latest Activity

Jim Werbaneth commented on Jim Werbaneth's blog post Line of Departure at Origins!
"Well, all the presentations went well, I think. It was also great meeting up with old friends,…"
14 hours ago
Wayne Rotella commented on Mark DAgosta's photo
yesterday
Mark DAgosta posted a photo

Land of the Two Rivers: Iraq War

Playtest map for upcoming game "Land of the Two Rivers", my first attempt at game design.…
Sunday
Joe Admire joined Matt Severns's group
Thumbnail

MARKETPLACE -

Buyin', Sellin' and good ol' fashioned horse tradin.......Can't find what you need? Go to the CSW…See More
Saturday
Steve K commented on Steve K's blog post Games I'm Playing 2019
"Gaming Session in Cedar Rapids: June10-13. Pacific Tide (3rd US loss I have played!) The US Civil…"
Saturday
Larry Banaszak is now a member of ConsimWorld
Friday
David Kazmierczak updated their profile
Friday
Profile IconMarek Dąbrowski, AJE SAKAMOTO and Nick Cartel joined ConsimWorld
Thursday

Groups

Events

Members

CSW Related Links

Please be sure to check-out these CSW services.

© 2019   Created by John Kranz.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service