There have not been a lot of conflicts in which game designers were able to do their work, have their games developed, and publish them between the time that the war started transitioning from hypothetical to inevitable. Desert Storm is one of the very few, and was a popular subject for designers. There was a Gulf Strike module, and Strategy & Tactics' Arabian Nightmare just to start, and with the exception of Command's game, essentially redesigned after the fact, all were intended to predict results.

But how many predicted anything close to the historical results? Command's Desert Storm should be disregarded for that question, as it was essentially redesigned after the fact to be a Coalition walk-over, at least unless Godzilla and a division of time-shifting Nazis appear.

In a sense, Desert Storm was wargaming's chance to model an upcoming conflict and then judge our results in the light of history. But how well did we did do?

Views: 23

Help Center

Latest Activity

Steve K commented on Steve K's blog post Games I'm Playing 2018
"Camperdown 1797 (Flying Colors): The Dutch break for shallow water, British pursue."
Oliver S. Linßen is now a member of ConsimWorld
Thomas Margraf joined Scott de Brestian's group

Michigan Wargamers

A place for gamers around the state to meet and converse.See More
Tony Rogers is now a member of ConsimWorld
Louis Robert Coatney commented on Peter Perla's blog post Looking for Chicago wargamer to help with Fletcher Pratt material
"Peter, I knew Dan.  He got me started in (metal) 1:1200s.  6 Italian destroyers and 2…"
Mike Nagel and Christian A. Strasser are now friends
Christian A. Strasser left a comment for Mike Nagel
"I went to your Relative Range site.  It's very interesting.  Of great interest to me…"
Christian A. Strasser left a comment for John Panagotopulos
"Are you still in Moorestown?"



CSW Related Links

Please be sure to check-out these CSW services.

© 2018   Created by John Kranz.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service