Post your questions and recommendations for NJ Hickman's excellent QUICK START RULES (QSR) for FIGHTING WINGS. These rules are very concise, so a few things do need clarifying for new players who don't have the benefit of a tutor/more experienced player! Hickman also admits to some errors in the example of play within the QS Scenarios, so we can discuss them here so newbies aren't confused. Attached are the latest PDF files for the rules, scenarios, and map from Uncle Ted's (the resource site NJ Hickman runs)!

Views: 299

Attachments:

Replies to This Discussion

We definitely need some sort of blurb on how to count range, particularly when either the shooter or the target is on a hexside. Of course, the full rules set has a diagram that spells that out neatly, but in the interest of brevity, we need something terse for the QSR. Would it be to much to suggest that "range in hexes between firer and shooter--when one or both aircraft is on a hexside--should be determined by assuming the hexide aircraft is/are in the adjacent hex closest to the other"???
EXAMPLE OF PLAY error? Looking at the otherwise exceptional and easy-to-understand example of play that comes with NJ Hickman's THE SUN AGAINST THE STARS scenarios, the following situation raises questions:

In the second column of page seven, Webster is considering is flight attitude options for Game Turn 1. In the first full paragraph of that column, the example notes that "If he elects to transition at the maximum rate of ET, he may transition four steps around the circle, which would put him into an inverted steep dive (STD). Furtherore, as he starts in the area where he will push "With Gravity," he is allowed to make an extra step of transition, so he could end in an inverted Shallow Dive (SHD)."

Now, doesn't this conflict with the following from the QSR: Under 3.4 TRANSITIONS PROCEDURE, the second paragraph, third sentence says: "Push transitions are limited to a maximum rate of HT-2." This is also parroted in the chart entitled Flight Attitudes Diagram.

Webster doesn't do this, of course, but the fact that option is even brought up makes me wonder.
Think in the example the plane could go inverted so the "push" would really a "pull" to dive (still with gravity) thus negating the HT 2 limitation. A later game turn shows a large attitude transition while inverted (game turn 3 or 4?).

Studying the QSR it looks like the quickest way to dive is to roll inverted while transitioning to a steep dive or go vertical. Might have to try this out next game.(which Eric should show up to). ....
QSR 3.1 is now available! This fixes the range hex counting problem and has a few other things included as well....
Attachments:

RSS

Help Center

Latest Activity

Nathan posted a video

Series Comparison: La Bataille [Regs XXX and ML] versus BAR

Series Comparison: La Bataille [Regs XXX and ML] versus BAR
18 hours ago
Scott Martin left a comment for Eric Walters
"Howdy back.  Seems to be a lot of Eric Walters in the USMC.  I knew one in my Game Club…"
yesterday
Eric Walters left a comment for Scott Martin
"Howdy, Scott!  Welcome to the CONSIMWORLD Social Website!  Am also a retired Marine, but…"
yesterday
Scott Martin is now a member of ConsimWorld
yesterday
Nathan posted a video

The Battle of Fontenoy [(3 - Final) Report Three - 1pm to 3pm - FRENCH VICTORY!]

The Battle of Fontenoy: 11 May, 1745 [Clash of Arms Games 2012] [Report Three [FINAL] 1pm to 3pm] Designers: Paul Dangel, Mathew Hinkle Series: Battles from ...
Monday
Jo Bader commented on Jo Bader's group Second Front
" "
Sunday
Jo Bader commented on Jo Bader's group Second Front
Sunday
Joseph replied to John Kranz's discussion What are you playing?
"Played at Monstercon: GMT's "U.S. Civil War" (aka:CSA's Revolutionary War of…"
Saturday

Events

Members

CSW Related Links

Please be sure to check-out these CSW services.

© 2019   Created by John Kranz.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service