Started by Kim Kanger. Last reply by Kim Kanger Mar 22.
Started by Steve Dixon. Last reply by Kim Kanger Feb 24.
Started by Eric Walters. Last reply by Wade Hyett Nov 15, 2012.
Started by Kim Kanger. Last reply by Kim Kanger Apr 6, 2011.
Started by Kim Kanger. Last reply by Kim Kanger Dec 3, 2010.
Started by Kim Kanger. Last reply by Kim Kanger Jun 16, 2010.
Started by Kim Kanger. Last reply by Borat Sagdiyev May 17, 2010.
Started by Robert Cleary. Last reply by Robert Cleary Mar 7, 2010.
Started by Jo Bader. Last reply by Jo Bader Apr 23, 2009.
Started by Darin Leviloff. Last reply by Darin Leviloff Feb 14, 2009.
Started by Kim Kanger. Last reply by Mike Erwin Jan 12, 2009.
Started by Kim Kanger. Last reply by Kim Kanger Oct 8, 2008.
Started by Steve Dixon. Last reply by Steve Dixon Mar 10, 2008.
Started by Andy Brown. Last reply by Kim Kanger Mar 8, 2008.
Started by Carl Paradis. Last reply by Carl Paradis Mar 6, 2008.
Comment
Comment by Kim Kanger on February 24, 2013 at 12:42pm And electronic games miss out the social interactive part of having an opponent across the table, and not across the nation.
Comment by Lincoln Graves on February 14, 2013 at 1:59am Very good points. Not to mention that the business model for electronic games pretty much requires an AI to make the game sell enough copies. And having an AI pretty much dumbs down most games even if you PBEM them instead.
Comment by Joseph A. Angiolillo Jr. on February 13, 2013 at 10:47pm I just listened to the rationale from Moritz Eggert that boardgames and electronic games will soon merge. As a computer game designer for Coleco and board game designer for SPI, Gameshop, Nova, GTD and others, as well as an American game historian, I think Moritz ignored the most important difference between boardgames and electronic games: electronic games evolve so fast, each new game is passe in less than three months. American boardgames since the first one in 1822 have been collected and replayed as part of a person's life. Not only do electronic games change so fast, the platforms and software needed for each game is gone in less than two years. I thought my game design of WarGames (based on the movie of the same name) would provide a lot of play for a long time, especially since the game won the award at the Consumer Electronics show in Las Vegas in 1984 for the best video cartridge of the year. It also sold 110,000 copies in the week of Christmas alone. But now I may be one of the only people on the planet that has a working copy of the game: you need a working Colecovision or Adam Computer as well as a working cartridge. Back in 1984 the chips were made by vapor depositing gold to approximately 20 atoms thick. Now the chips are vapor deposited to 3 atoms thick. Just like videotapes decayed in 30 years because they use magnetism and our planet has a magnetic field, chips today will disintigrate because of misalignment of gold threads in the computer chips by overuse or being kept anywhere close to working electrical or electronic equipment. Boardgames were built to last. Electronics are not only built to make money, they are built to disintigrate.
So, until you can show me an electronic game that is still widely played for thirty years and is played by a large number of gamers against one another, I will remain sceptical. We must first invent an electronic system than will not be disposed of yearly and will not disintegrate in two to ten years.
Comment by Kim Kanger on February 13, 2013 at 4:09am
Comment by Mark on September 19, 2010 at 2:21am
Comment by Kim Kanger on December 19, 2009 at 10:41am 
Comment by Kim Kanger on September 18, 2009 at 4:47am
Comment by Kim Kanger on October 8, 2008 at 3:35am
Comment by Kim Kanger on March 24, 2008 at 1:28pm
Markus Klaas added a discussion to the group Hexdraw Users
Steve K commented on Steve K's blog post Games I'm Playing 2013
Vinny Hart replied to Alan Sutton's discussion Let's get this thing rolling Geeks!© 2013 Created by John Kranz.
You need to be a member of The world of designing to add comments!