Some Immodest Proposals to Save the American Defense Establishment

America is trouble. I read it in the New York Times, so it has to be true. And after minutes of careless deliberation while inebriated, I think I know the reason.

We are let down by those who establish our defense policy. These policies just don't reflect the realities of a modern world, reflecting a kind of Neanderthal, pre-2009 reality that many people would like to forget, and others never knew a damned thing about.

Therefore I've come up with some really good ideas for reforming American defense and bringing it more in line with what Katie Couric tells me is reality. So read my ideas, and learn something.

The first thing we should do is eliminate all the service academies. These places are terrible, and terrible wastes of money. Instead, that money should be reallocated to a variety of social programs, especially for the truly undeserving, and a new academy that teaches real service.

I want to start the Peace Academy. Instead of turning out classes of men and women who know useless stuff like war and engineering, we should be turning out classes of community organizers and diversity facilitators. Moreover, there would be no sports, especially football. Students though would be required to spend a year in mandatory volunteerism.

Furthermore, I want to change the oath that service members take upon enlistment. Instead of pledging their loyalty to the United States of America, they would pledge allegiance to all mankind. I feel better already just talking about it.

Nor would American medals and awards be awarded only to those who distinguish themselves. Under my plan, everyone would get a medal, just for showing up. Self-esteem is too precious to disregard by awarding medals only to the brave and the skilled. Everyone would be made to feel good inside.

Connected to this, American military decorations would be given to non-Americans more frequently. And I'm not just talking about our allies; I want to give decorations to our enemies as well. After all, who are we to say that we're so special? And our side doesn't have a monopoly on bravery, but then again, bravery, like all other signs of accomplishment, would no longer be a prerequisite for anything. Besides, I'm sure that our enemies would appreciate the sign of consideration, and be inspired to love us just as we embrace them.

Wars are politics by other means, and so I would not neglect the political side of my bold plan. Therefore the State Department would have an Undersecretary for Apologies. The United States of America would become a lot more practiced and skilled at apologizing for everything. Likewise, my America would eschew preemptive wars in favor of preemptive apologies. People would like us more I'm sure of that.

Image is everything, and substance has to take a back seat, where it belongs. The navy is going to uphold America's image through better names for warships... I mean Ships of Peace. Therefore naval vessels will be renamed to demonstrate our values in a more visible manner. Imagine the hope in the eyes of the little foreign children when they see an aircraft carrier named USS Gender Equity, or an amphibious diversity facilitation ship called Forgiveness?

I am so glad to share this outstanding program. I'm even happier to live in a time and place where somebody just might take it seriously.

Views: 39

Comment

You need to be a member of ConsimWorld to add comments!

Join ConsimWorld

Comment by JACK WELLS on May 10, 2009 at 2:35am
Glad I already did my 25 yrs in the military. It was an oath to uphold the Constitution. But the ReEducation camps have given me the insight to understand that the Constitution can not be truly understood the way the bad old white men and slave owners wrote it. The Correct Interpretation can only be made by those with Higher Ideals. The rest of us can just pay to breathe.
Comment by Jim Werbaneth on May 5, 2009 at 3:18pm
The good folks at Government House are supposed to tell me some day.
Comment by Jon Compton on May 5, 2009 at 3:07pm
Who is John Galt?
Comment by Dale Holmstrom on April 29, 2009 at 10:21pm

yes-I mentioned the candidate-I usually am a good sport when l lose.
Comment by Jim Werbaneth on April 29, 2009 at 9:22pm
Did I mention a candidate? Or a party?
Comment by Jim Werbaneth on April 29, 2009 at 3:32pm
Re-education camp, oh boy! We got to make macaroni art portraits of Che Guevara.
Comment by Dale Holmstrom on April 29, 2009 at 3:17pm
I wholeheartedly agree! Since taking the red pill and attending re-education camp I sing the praises with the Main Stream Media, the wisdom of the greatest generation---aka-the exalted baby boomers, and the rest of my Amerikan Komrades ---Praise Obama the world mender and peace maker!

Help Center

Latest Activity

Nathan posted a video

Series Comparison: La Bataille [Regs XXX and ML] versus BAR

Series Comparison: La Bataille [Regs XXX and ML] versus BAR
18 hours ago
Scott Martin left a comment for Eric Walters
"Howdy back.  Seems to be a lot of Eric Walters in the USMC.  I knew one in my Game Club…"
yesterday
Eric Walters left a comment for Scott Martin
"Howdy, Scott!  Welcome to the CONSIMWORLD Social Website!  Am also a retired Marine, but…"
yesterday
Scott Martin is now a member of ConsimWorld
yesterday
Nathan posted a video

The Battle of Fontenoy [(3 - Final) Report Three - 1pm to 3pm - FRENCH VICTORY!]

The Battle of Fontenoy: 11 May, 1745 [Clash of Arms Games 2012] [Report Three [FINAL] 1pm to 3pm] Designers: Paul Dangel, Mathew Hinkle Series: Battles from ...
Monday
Jo Bader commented on Jo Bader's group Second Front
" "
Sunday
Jo Bader commented on Jo Bader's group Second Front
Sunday
Joseph replied to John Kranz's discussion What are you playing?
"Played at Monstercon: GMT's "U.S. Civil War" (aka:CSA's Revolutionary War of…"
Saturday

Events

Members

CSW Related Links

Please be sure to check-out these CSW services.

© 2019   Created by John Kranz.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service