This is from a post in the game folder on the consim forum)

End of turn 10

Marc Guenette and I reached the end of turn 10 last night, and we'll be calling the game here as a Soviet victory. 3 VPs already in the bag - 2 for the Luftwaffe and support units (Grossgewitter "lite"), 1 for 50+ steps.

I bid high -12 and 13 vs 10 and 8 - for the initiative on turns 8 and 9, but lost it on turn 10 (11 to 10, die roll carried the day for Sovs). Inititative is crucial, and the Axis simply HAVE to bid very high.

Here are some overall lessons learned:

I wasn't bold enough at the beginning and worried too much about leaving my spearheads OOS. As it turns out, supply is really not that punishing a factor - even allowing the panzers to suffer the odd counterattack while on organic would have been better than my overly cautious advance.

Striking the right balance between splitting up stacks to achieve multi-hex attacks vs keeping strong stacks for effective hasty attacks is another fine point of subtlety in the system. A real challenge which requires a good deal of thinking ahead. Ultimately, the latter course is probably wiser - the spearheads have to be kept intact, let the Romanians and support groups deal with Soviet forward formations. Intact spearheads leads to more and better hasty attacks, which allows higher initiative bidding.

Airpower - I squandered fighters beating off Soviet ground attacks a few times too many. Take the lumps - make sure the Luftwaffe's interdiction and ground attacks get through instead. Interdiction is paramount, I didn't do enough of it. Better to slow down an entire army than knock a few steps off a single unit - UNLESS it's a key, bridge-crossing attack.

Grossgewitter - between the 2VPs lost and the extra Soviet air, taking only the Luftwaffe and support units is a case of too little too late. Either go with the historical setup and maximize the air supremacy, or take the full monty of available units - the compromise didn't work.

We really enjoyed this and will be playing it again, with Marc taking the lessons learned and trying his hand at applying them as the Axis. Seeing more games using this system would be fantastic - it strikes just the right balance between complexity and playability, and feels very historical.

Some pics of the end of turn 10:






Views: 161

Comment

You need to be a member of ConsimWorld to add comments!

Join ConsimWorld

Comment by Daniel Gagnon on March 27, 2008 at 6:12pm
Kai - we used the tile spacers to illustrate the activation radii for the various soviet reserve formations. A bit gamey, but it kept us from constantly checking the map and referring to the scenario notes to see whether anything had been triggered. Another use is for marking off attack locations. We have them painted in several colours and they come in handy in one guise or another at just about every title we play ;-)
Comment by Kai Jensen on March 27, 2008 at 9:13am
Thanks for the AAR and pics. It's nice to preview a game like this - I own it but have not opened the rulebook yet. What are the colored tile spacers marking?
Comment by Marc Guenette on March 26, 2008 at 1:52pm
God, I really put you in the hole, dodn't I ;P
Comment by John Kranz on March 26, 2008 at 1:19pm
Thanks for sharing this AAR and including some picts. I hope we see more of these in the future!

Help Center

Latest Activity

Ian Schofield posted a photo

H&M Fraustadt 30YW Minis

Horse & Musket from Hollandspiele, set up for Fraustadt, but using 30YW minis - I am waiting…
4 hours ago
Joseph C. Beard III replied to Eric Walters's discussion Breakthrough and Benchmark SPI Designs--Your Assessments? in the group All things SPI
"Greetings Eric and Russ: I have been thinking about the general topic of this forum and…"
Monday
Joseph C. Beard III replied to Eric Walters's discussion Breakthrough and Benchmark SPI Designs--Your Assessments? in the group All things SPI
"Greetings Russ: The chronology of SPI's several pre-KURSK attempts to inject a…"
Sunday
Russ Gifford replied to Eric Walters's discussion Breakthrough and Benchmark SPI Designs--Your Assessments? in the group All things SPI
"Joe's point on WELLINGTON'S VICTORY is certainly apt. One thing I regret to this day…"
Sunday
Russ Gifford replied to Eric Walters's discussion Breakthrough and Benchmark SPI Designs--Your Assessments? in the group All things SPI
"I guess I see CITYFIGHT as a breakthrough that went no where, but could have gone anywhere. I…"
Sunday
Russ Gifford replied to Eric Walters's discussion Breakthrough and Benchmark SPI Designs--Your Assessments? in the group All things SPI
"So glad this thread brought Joe to the table! I was trying to decide how best to quote him on the…"
Sunday
Eric Walters replied to Eric Walters's discussion Breakthrough and Benchmark SPI Designs--Your Assessments? in the group All things SPI
"So, let's call the new discussion thread "One of a Kind SPI Designs."…"
Sunday
Joseph C. Beard III replied to Eric Walters's discussion Breakthrough and Benchmark SPI Designs--Your Assessments? in the group All things SPI
"Greetings Again Eric: You are quite correct that a number of very innovative SPI designs just never…"
Sunday

Groups

Events

Members

CSW Related Links

Please be sure to check-out these CSW services.

© 2019   Created by John Kranz.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service