Connections 2010--Dayton OH: AAR Part 1

Map detail from MILLENNIUM WARS 2.0

Connections is a gathering of DoD and commercial wargamers to exchange ideas--this year's theme is "Enhancing wargaming ability to anticipate the future of warfare." Meeting ever since 1993 under the sponsorship of the Air Force (and led by Matt Caffrey, now a retired reserve USAF Colonel), the conference brings not only the leading lights of the commercial wargaming scene, but also some heavy hitters in industry and the Department of Defense. This year is proving to be no exception to past patterns.

Day 1 was the Air Force Research Lab's "Big Week" classroom sessions on wargaming, tailored for a primarily military audience that has had little to no experience in the subject. Class continued through Day 2, while Connections formally kicked off with Matt's three-hour presentation on the History of Wargaming on Tuesday afternoon. While he gives this presentation at every conference, he's been refining it over the years so it's always a bit different with new insights and demolishing many cherished myths. The day was capped off with an ice-breaker for the Connections crowds at the Comfort Suites just across from the US Air Force museum.

Day 3 saw Connections hit full stride. The morning opened with LtCol Passenault of the Air Force Research Labs giving an overview of the organization, mission, and accomplishments of AFRL. Then, Dr. Al Nofi, Center for Naval Analyses, and LtCol Tim Schulties, AF/A8XC ran a panel presentation titled "Anticipating Military Technology Needs and Opportunities."

LtCol Passenault giving the AFRL perspective on wargaming.

Mike Markowitz kicked off the discussion with a general discussion of how cultural influences affected technological choices, adoption, and employment. Dr. Al Nofi followed this up with a presentation titled "Looking Forward: Predicting Advances in Military Technology" which was quite a tonic for those who presumed that the record of accurate prediction was a good one.

Mike Markowitz goes "old school" with the white board and markers. No "death by PowerPoint!"

The later morning session was co-chaired by Dr. John Tiller, a well-known and quite prolific computer wargame designer, and Dr. William Lademan of the Wargaming Division of the Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory. Dr. Bruce Gudmundsson started things off with a short presentation on the Prussian applicatory method, which included case method, staff rides, and wargaming, which made the German military more receptive to using wargames for educational, evaluation, and operations rehearsal purposes.

Dr. Gudmundsson considers a question on the Prussian readiness to accept wargaming.

Captain Jeff Cares, USN, of the Naval War College, spoke on the resurrection of Naval Operational Art through a manual board wargame they are promoting for numbered fleet use.

CAPT Cares and the Naval War College website URL below where you can find a discussion board on Naval Operational Art (and wargaming support for it).

Dave Ross, of the AFRL, provided a detailed look at a political game modeling counterinsurgency versus insurgency with a host of involved actors, called SMITE.

Dave Ross explains research sources for the AFRL SMITE game.

Over lunch, John Gresham, co-author of many of the Tom Clancy non-fiction books, did his unclassified open source view of current international defense trends.

The always effervescent, entertaining, and thought-provoking John Gresham

The afternoon began with a panel entitled "Innovations in Civilian Wargaming." Peter Bogdasarian started with his informal discussion on the major trends in civilian gaming. While DoD games have been following more "classic" wargame ideas of control and certainty, the civilian games--particularly the Card Driven Games (CDGs)--have gone in the opposite direction.

Peter Bogdasarian relating the divergences between commercial and DoD gaming.

Major Mike Martin, currently a student at Old Dominion University, gave a presentation on automated interfaces in online and computer wargaming, providing a look at emerging technologies and the possibilities inherent for improving not only the simulation itself, but the experience for the player through ease of use.

Major Mike Martin giving the audience a glimpse into new technical interfaces for computer wargame applications.

Brant Guillory ended the panel with his presentation, which basically opened a Pandora's Box of intense discussion in the room over a number of issues in creating games for government use.

The last session was called "Methods of Future Warfare Adjudication." Dr. Roger Mason of LECMgt presented his Afghanistan Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) game, in which the players were the Afghan Government, the NATO PRT Commander, or an aggregated NGO operation.

Joe Miranda continued with a discussion of a number of models, to include Mike Anderson talking about Millennium Wars 2.0 and the States in Conflict game that he's given to AGAINST THE ODDS magazine about the Arab-Israeli conflicts.

Mike Anderson explaining OODA loop modeling in the Millennium Wars 2.0 system.

Jon Compton finished with a very controversial and thought-provoking discussion of our unintentional analytical biases in framing questions for gaming to answer, which provoked some very interesting philosophical discussions.

Jon Compton busts some metacognitive bubbles.

Of course, no Connections would be complete without a game night demo. The pictures below give you a sense of what was shown and played:

Paul Vebber demonstrating the U.S. Naval War College game on naval operational art.

Yes, the map just screams at your to play the game! This is part of the inland sea which is mirrored on both sides of an open ocean so neither player enjoys a geographic advantage.

Joe Miranda and Mike Anderson put THE BATTLE OF BAGHDAD through its paces

Brant Guillory and the Bayonet Games ORANGE CRUSH playtest


Yes, there was even a miniatures game in progress!

Map detail and counters for the MILLENNIUM WARS 2.0 system, this covering the Arab-Israeli conflicts, both past and present.

Peter Bogdasarian demonstrating Lock 'N Load's DAWN'S EARLY LIGHT--his design of hypothetical Warsaw Pact-NATO ground combat in the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany)

And Dr. Al Nofi and Mike Markowitz demonstrating their naval technology development game, SEAPOWERS, to an Air Force officer.

Views: 1327

Comment

You need to be a member of ConsimWorld to add comments!

Join ConsimWorld

Comment by Joseph Miranda on May 7, 2010 at 12:42am
I see Kim Kanger posting here. He has an article on the Algerian insurgency in the current S&T (262).
Comment by Hawkeye on May 5, 2010 at 12:28pm
I'd be very curious to know more about the Afghan COIN project. I am currently working on a State Department contract training Interagency Civilians who are bound for Afghanistan and have been talking to different people about the need for such a game. Nice to know others are thinking along the same lines.
Comment by Joe Saur on April 7, 2010 at 11:01am
My thanks to Jon Compton and John Koester for graciously participating in the miniatures game!
Comment by Kim Kanger on April 1, 2010 at 6:57am
Thanks for the info. I'm just curious about eventual buyers of Ici within the state/military/organisations/education and so on :-)
Comment by Peter Perla on March 31, 2010 at 6:52am
Hi Kim,
The Operational Wrap Around in the incarnation Mike demoed at Connections is a card-base game dealing with counter-insurgency at an operational-tactical level and fairly abstractly. We are working on a new version that is more of a card-driven game. This one is targeted at Afghanistan. It is part of a larger Army effort to integrate tactical gaming and operational gaming with an agent-based model of population effects. Think of it as Frankensteinian combination of We the People, 1960: Making of the President, Algeria, Ici, and other crazy ideas. Of course, most of it is ion my head at the moment as we are just starting to try to write the rules.
Comment by Jon Compton on March 31, 2010 at 6:18am
If we told you, we'd have to kill you.
Comment by Kim Kanger on March 31, 2010 at 6:01am
Do any of you guys have any contact with OSD?
Comment by Kim Kanger on March 31, 2010 at 2:35am
Thanks Peter, I'm glad you that you like Ici. But please tell me, "OWA", "CNA"? I feel a bit out of touch here. Could yould please refresh my memory and tell me more about your design?
Comment by Brian Train on March 29, 2010 at 5:04pm
Thanks Eric - I will write Matt as well. I've been meaning to talk to him about Project WARRIOR.
Comment by Eric Walters on March 29, 2010 at 5:02pm
Brian,
I just talked to Matt about the website postings--it will be a while, but when he gets the presentations posted, I'll put the link here. OWA is a CNA product and I'd steer you to Peter Perla on that. Matt can hook you up with Dave Ross for SMITE--Matt's e-mail is matthew.caffrey@wpafb.af.mil.

Help Center

Latest Activity

Nathan posted a video

Series Comparison: La Bataille [Regs XXX and ML] versus BAR

Series Comparison: La Bataille [Regs XXX and ML] versus BAR
12 hours ago
Scott Martin left a comment for Eric Walters
"Howdy back.  Seems to be a lot of Eric Walters in the USMC.  I knew one in my Game Club…"
yesterday
Eric Walters left a comment for Scott Martin
"Howdy, Scott!  Welcome to the CONSIMWORLD Social Website!  Am also a retired Marine, but…"
yesterday
Scott Martin is now a member of ConsimWorld
yesterday
Nathan posted a video

The Battle of Fontenoy [(3 - Final) Report Three - 1pm to 3pm - FRENCH VICTORY!]

The Battle of Fontenoy: 11 May, 1745 [Clash of Arms Games 2012] [Report Three [FINAL] 1pm to 3pm] Designers: Paul Dangel, Mathew Hinkle Series: Battles from ...
yesterday
Jo Bader commented on Jo Bader's group Second Front
" "
Sunday
Jo Bader commented on Jo Bader's group Second Front
Sunday
Joseph replied to John Kranz's discussion What are you playing?
"Played at Monstercon: GMT's "U.S. Civil War" (aka:CSA's Revolutionary War of…"
Saturday

Events

Members

CSW Related Links

Please be sure to check-out these CSW services.

© 2019   Created by John Kranz.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service