Tonight, I've read a lot of tributes to Nelson Mandela upon his passing.  Respect for him appears to cross ideological lines, with liberals, conservatives and libertarians alike paying their respects.

There are some in the minority though, pointing out that he was a Communist terrorist, condemning him and those who laud him.  I have to strongly disagree with what I see as some prose that can only be described as mean-spirited and short-sighted.  True, he did have allies who were Communists and terrorists, including the Communist Party of South Africa.  My view is that he was a pragmatist, who took allies as he could, and demonstrated gratitude to them.  Sometimes that meant accepting some bad bedfellows, such as the PLO, Libya, and that center of Red wretchedness, the USSR.

But more than his associations as a revolutionary, Mandela should be judged for what he accomplished twenty-seven years later, upon his release from prison.  Consider his role in the racial bloodletting and civil war that followed.  Oh, what bloodbath, you might ask?  That we didn't see South Africa convulse into vengeance or a Hobbesian war of all against law was, in large part, due to the effective, and I'll add, morally inspired, leadership of Nelson Mandela.

This was not inevitable.  He could have followed the path of Robert Mugabe, into dictatorship, corruption, violence and oppression.  And he would have been cheered by the multitudes, at least for a while.  Instead he took a much, much higher road.  Then he did something most rare for an African leader: He left office at the end of his term, refusing to be seduced by power.

I have to admit that while he was in prison, I was highly skeptical of the prospects of such inspired post-apartheid leadership, including by Nelson Mandela.  He was not a plaster saint either; great men too have their share of foibles and flaws.  But there is no way to deny that in the end, he was the right man in the right place for the end of apartheid.

Godspeed, Madiba.

Views: 106

Comment

You need to be a member of ConsimWorld to add comments!

Join ConsimWorld

Comment by Jim Werbaneth on December 7, 2013 at 9:33pm

I'm still seeing a lot of chatter elsewhere about him being a "radical Marxist" and a terrorist, and altogether no friend of the United States or its values.  I do accept that he had Marxist-Leninist allies, for whom he retained gratitude.  Also, upon his release and especially as president of South Africa, Nelson Mandela said some awful things about my own country.  Similarly, my hometown paper, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, referred to him as a "political saint." There is a tendency toward extremes, either extreme condemnation, or unrealistic canonization. 

But what matters to me more, and I mean a lot more, are his deeds and their results, not selected quotes, and certainly not the random brickbats that some feel compelled to fling in his general direction.  The hagiography too can be misleading.  The ultimate verdict on Mandela, I firmly believe, will be based on the way that he could win over former enemies, even some of the most bitter, through essential humanity and, neglected too often and especially on the internet, good manners.  Secondly, he offered South Africa an exceptionally soft landing upon the collapse of apartheid.  The first represents uncommon character; the second extraordinary results.

Comment by Kim Kanger on December 7, 2013 at 12:11pm

He led his life totally uncorrupted by power. Mugabe actually had the opportunity of walking this path too, after his period of reconciliation in Rhodesia. Instead he chose to be despised instead. The example set by Mandela puts a vast majority of would leaders to shame.

Rest in peace, Mandela

Comment by Wayne Rotella on December 6, 2013 at 6:48am

Well said Jim!

And thank you for the comparison to Mugabe. Many of the negative words used against Mandela can be said of Mugabe as well. The difference is that Mandela chose the path of peace and forgiveness in order to unite a fractured country.

Help Center

Latest Activity

Ian Schofield posted a photo

Shiva Group First

The third ever show Shiva was entered into and he won the Hound Group. My wife was thrilled. The…
Wednesday
Nathan posted a video

'The Grand Campaign' [4 - FINAL] - Serbien muss sterbien (2 Nov to 23 Dec - 1914)

'The Grand Campaign, The Battle for Serbia 1914' 1914: Serbien Muss Sterbien [GMT Games 2015] Designer: Michael Resch
Tuesday
Profile IconKevin Strong, Jose Luis Gomez and Kenneth Trout joined ConsimWorld
Monday
Ian Schofield posted a photo

Group 4th

Shiva is very tired after his second dog show of the day.
Monday
Grofaz joined Eric Walters's group
Thumbnail

Gaming Contemporary Tactical Ground Combat

Discuss your favorite games/systems/scenarios covering pre-WWII to hypothetical future tactical…See More
May 17
Jim Millard commented on Brian Blad's group World At War
"Anybody out there have the Compendium Vol. 2 that they want to part with?"
May 17
Profile IconDon Easter, Jason Moffat, javier guitian rivas and 1 more joined ConsimWorld
May 17
Joseph replied to Chuang Shyue Chou's discussion What are you reading?
"Read: " Slavery, Terrorism and Islam" by Peter Hammond. A fascinating read and thoroughly…"
May 16

Events

Members

CSW Related Links

Please be sure to check-out these CSW services.

© 2019   Created by John Kranz.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service