Recently a group of us assembled at the University of Ottawa to matrix-game the current conflict regarding the self-styled “Islamic State” in Iraq and Syria. For practical reasons and to limit the number of players/teams, the game largely focused on Iraq. The purpose, as with an earlier game held at the UK Defence Academy, was to explore the value and limits of matrix games as an analytical method.

...

Our players and teams were well qualified: wargamers and operations research analysts from Defence Research and Development Canada, game designers, political scientists, and current or former Middle East intelligence analysts. How did it all work out?

Full blog post here: https://paxsims.wordpress.com/2015/02/07/revisiting-the-isis-crisis/

Views: 271

Comment

You need to be a member of ConsimWorld to add comments!

Join ConsimWorld

Comment by Rex Brynen on April 15, 2015 at 8:25am

Several of the players in various games have been involved in intelligence support to the current fight, and the game has also been run with current military (although not necessarily those involved in counter-ISIS ops). Anecdotally I would say that the players who do best are those with area knowledge + strategic common sense, regardless of professional background.

Comment by Michael "Sudsy" Sutherland on April 15, 2015 at 6:16am

Did you have any former or current war fighters involved?  Sometimes that perspective, from first hand experience, can be enlightening to any process of conflict analysis.

Comment by Roger Morley on March 4, 2015 at 2:30pm

Discussions, debates and civil arguments are good to have, something that this place has lacked for a while

Comment by Rex Brynen on March 4, 2015 at 1:39pm

Yes, Roger--I was thinking the same. It's nice to have a proper conversation.

Comment by Roger Morley on March 4, 2015 at 1:35pm

If anything it has brought some life back into ConsimworldSocial, as it has lacked decent activity for a while

Comment by Bill on March 4, 2015 at 1:33pm

We did Roger :)

Comment by Roger Morley on March 4, 2015 at 1:27pm

No probs Bill. I think at the start of these comments, I do not think I was getting the right answers out of Rex and I was not giving you or Rex the rights answers.

I think we got there in the end :)

Comment by Roger Morley on March 4, 2015 at 1:18pm
Thank you Rex for your last two comments, as it has explained and elaborated what you get out of this game and how such big variables are dealt with, and I can appreciate what you have done with this game, and how you have done it.
Comment by Bill on March 4, 2015 at 1:06pm

Thanks Rex. Very interesting.  Roger: Ok, at least I understand where your coming from.

Comment by Rex Brynen on March 4, 2015 at 12:53pm

Roger: Thanks for that, it clarifies where you are coming from.

We're dealing with a situation that: 1) has to be analyzed, and 2) where there are a great many variables, some of which cannot even be identified as variables in advance, and others for which their value cannot be determined with any precision. Dice are simply a quick way of representing all that uncertainty, and to avoid the umpire imposing his/her own views on the game narrative.

The game is not intended to ask question such as "will current Iraqi operations in Tikrit be successful?" Rather it explores questions like "how would ISIS respond to slow but steady IA gains on its southern flank?" or "how might such gains affect the perspective of current ISIS Sunni allies and fence-sitters?" (etc).

In this respect it's not all that different from the usual seminar-type brainstorming discussions that are very common in the intelligence community--it's just a different way of doing it.

Help Center

Latest Activity

Ian Schofield posted a photo

Shiva Group First

The third ever show Shiva was entered into and he won the Hound Group. My wife was thrilled. The…
Wednesday
Nathan posted a video

'The Grand Campaign' [4 - FINAL] - Serbien muss sterbien (2 Nov to 23 Dec - 1914)

'The Grand Campaign, The Battle for Serbia 1914' 1914: Serbien Muss Sterbien [GMT Games 2015] Designer: Michael Resch
Tuesday
Profile IconKevin Strong, Jose Luis Gomez and Kenneth Trout joined ConsimWorld
Monday
Ian Schofield posted a photo

Group 4th

Shiva is very tired after his second dog show of the day.
Monday
Grofaz joined Eric Walters's group
Thumbnail

Gaming Contemporary Tactical Ground Combat

Discuss your favorite games/systems/scenarios covering pre-WWII to hypothetical future tactical…See More
May 17
Jim Millard commented on Brian Blad's group World At War
"Anybody out there have the Compendium Vol. 2 that they want to part with?"
May 17
Profile IconDon Easter, Jason Moffat, javier guitian rivas and 1 more joined ConsimWorld
May 17
Joseph replied to Chuang Shyue Chou's discussion What are you reading?
"Read: " Slavery, Terrorism and Islam" by Peter Hammond. A fascinating read and thoroughly…"
May 16

Events

Members

CSW Related Links

Please be sure to check-out these CSW services.

© 2019   Created by John Kranz.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service