S&T No. 242 - They Died With Their Boots On, Vol 2 - Chasing Villa

For Labor Day Weekend, I decided to try out "They Died With Their Boots On", Vol. 2. This was originally published in S&T 242 and there's actually two games, the US Campaign in the Old Northwest against the Indians/British in 1791-94 and Pershing's pursuit of Pancho Villa.

My overall impression is that it's an interesting challenge in a small package (not a bad thing at all). I played the Pershing scenario and one of the most striking things was that either the US or Villista player could gain control of the various Mexican Government forces. As the US player, I was able to use them to try and grind down the Villista forces (primarily the Army de Norte) at a loss of VPs or simply send them on a fool's errand, racing down the railroad to Parral or some other out of the way place.

As the Villista, the Mexican Government forces were useful for wearing down the US- US losses count for VPs but anything the US destroys gets no VPs. Of course, there's the roll for VPs for having a Mexican Government force attack US units...(and vice-versa) For the most part, I didn't find the heroism counters to be problem when playing solitaire. In particular, for ambush markers, I went under the assumption that they could be triggered at anytime so movement could be somewhat slowed down.

The only thing that I found difficult was the combat table- it's extremely bloody and in many respects the game is a war of attrition where low odds attacks can be punished severely for the attacker. For the US player, the division of the US forces into commands does act to hinder the US player from gaining high-odds attacks since some commands like the West Collum are pretty weak. I'm going to give this one another try soon.

Views: 50


You need to be a member of ConsimWorld to add comments!

Join ConsimWorld

Comment by Adam Lid on September 4, 2008 at 1:18am
It's an interesting system although combat is quite bloody. I'll have to give the Custer Campaign a try.
Comment by Darin Leviloff on September 4, 2008 at 12:54am
I tried the Northwestern Indian conflict (Mad Anthony?) scenarios in the same system. Found it worked quite well and the random initiative system added alot of unpredictability. I understand that Joe is going to take this system into Finland in the "World at War" magazine.
Comment by Smitty on September 3, 2008 at 8:02pm
Their Custer campaign game based upon this system is well worth your time and effort.

Help Center

Latest Activity

John Kane left a comment for Eric Walters
"Hi, Eric. Thanks for the welcome. I'll have a wee look around shortly. Family life is a bit…"
19 hours ago
Brian Dodge left a comment for Eric Walters
"Hi Eric. Thank you for the warm welcome. I am sure I will be able to find some great groups to join."
20 hours ago
Eric Walters left a comment for John Kane
"Welcome to the CONSIMWORLD Social Website, John!  I hope you find some groups that you like…"
21 hours ago
Eric Walters left a comment for Thom Hall
"Thom, welcome to the CONSIMWORLD Social Website.  Yeah, I have that same problem with listing…"
21 hours ago
Eric Walters left a comment for James Boyd
"James, welcome to the CONSIMWORLD Social Website!  Stonewall's Sword is sure a cool game;…"
21 hours ago
Eric Walters left a comment for Brian Dodge
"Brian, welcome to the CONSIMWORLD Social Website!  Decision Games' D-DAY AT OMAHA beach…"
21 hours ago
Profile IconThom Hall, James Boyd, John Kane and 1 more joined ConsimWorld
21 hours ago
Joseph replied to Chuang Shyue Chou's discussion What are you reading?
"Read: "Stephen and Matilda: The Civil War of 1139-53" by Jim Bradbury. Stephen promised…"
21 hours ago




CSW Related Links

© 2020   Created by John Kranz.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service