Anxiety appears to be building within the Islamic Ummah (community) over Iran's geopolitical intentions. On 9 July 2008, Iran test fired 4 long and medium range missiles, allegedly capable of reaching "The Zionist Entity" (as Israel is often referred to). The test, pictured above from, deepened the concern of the US about Iran's motives of its supposedly peaceful nuclear power program.

Israel and the US aren't the only ones concerned. Joe Blanchette sent me this Wall Street Journal article on the subject:

A Middle East Arms Race
The Arabs respond to the likelihood of the Iranian bomb.

Hosni Mubarak is no one's idea of a visionary, but in sensing the Middle East's political winds he has few equals. So when Egypt's president-for-life warned his ruling party last week that "the Persians are trying to devour the Arab states," it's worth paying attention.
The immediate cause of the remarks is a war of words by Iran that led Mr. Mubarak to recall an envoy from Tehran last week. Among other provocations was the recent release of an Iranian film celebrating the 1981 assassination of Anwar Sadat, Mr. Mubarak's predecessor. A Tehran demonstration late last month also called for Mr. Mubarak's execution, on the grounds of his alleged "subservience to the Zionists."
But the broader context of the friction is its steady progress toward a nuclear weapon and the encroachment by Iran into the Arab world -- principally through Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza and the Mahdists in Iraq. States like Egypt and Saudi Arabia watched with dismay in the summer of 2006 as Israel failed to deliver a knockout blow against Hezbollah. Now they calculate that the U.S. lacks the will to prevent a nuclear Iran. As for Barack Obama's promise of "tough diplomacy," we suspect the Arab states take him about as seriously as they would a tourist who thinks he knows how to bargain at an oriental bazaar.
Little wonder, then, that the Arab states are taking a keen interest in acquiring nuclear capabilities of their own. The latest is the United Arab Emirates, which hopes to sign a nuclear cooperation agreement with the U.S. before the Bush Administration leaves office. Saudi Arabia is seeking a similar deal, while Egypt, Algeria, Turkey and even Yemen are also in the market for reactors.
The ostensible rationale for these reactors varies from place to place, from energy-intensive water desalination schemes to reliable electricity supply. Under the terms of the agreement being proposed for the U.A.E. and Saudi Arabia, neither country would enrich its own uranium and both would put their facilities under the safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Still, it's difficult to see what use oil giants like the Saudis or Algerians would have for nuclear power except as a hedge against an Iranian bomb. IAEA safeguards or not, possession of "civilian" nuclear technology served India and Israel as the crucial first step to getting a bomb. It gave local scientists first-hand experience with the technologies and allowed opportunities for the covert diversion of key nuclear materials. Reports have circulated for years that the Saudis have pursued a secret nuclear program with help from Pakistan, though the Saudis deny this. Egypt has also been cited by the IAEA for undeclared nuclear work.
All this is a useful reminder that the threat of Iran's nuclear programs lies not only in whether it will acquire a bomb. It's also a question of how Iran's neighbors will react. The Israelis have said publicly that a nuclear Iran is an intolerable threat, a view many Arab states share privately. If neither Israel nor the U.S. act, they will be tempted to seek their security by acquiring their own nuclear deterrents. A Middle East in which Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt have the bomb -- in addition to Israel and Pakistan -- is possible within a decade.
Maybe there's someone at the Council on Foreign Relations who can explain why this isn't such a terrible scenario, what with everyone pointing a gun at everyone else's head. Our view is that this is a recipe for global instability, if not catastrophe, and a reminder of why no one should be complacent at the looming prospect of an Iranian bomb.

Views: 36


You need to be a member of ConsimWorld to add comments!

Join ConsimWorld

Comment by Smitty on December 23, 2008 at 6:10am
I like the back missle the best!
Comment by Greg Blanchett on December 23, 2008 at 5:53am
Even the untrained eye can clearly tell that entire picture has been Photoshopped...
Comment by Smitty on December 23, 2008 at 5:41am
I love the Republician Guards - partic the ones in Iraq....
Comment by Ted Henkle on December 23, 2008 at 3:14am
Brant, now that you mention it I think it was, in that they added a couple more missiles to the launch. I got it from "," who in turn, got it from the Iranian Republican Guards website--not the most trustworthy sites I'm sure. I try to add pictures to my posts for visual appeal. I didn't mean to perpetuate the Republican Guards' disinformation/propaganda campaign! :)

Help Center

Latest Activity

Joseph replied to Chuang Shyue Chou's discussion What are you reading?
"Read: "City of Victory: The Rise and Fall of Vijayanagara" by Rarnakar Sadasyula. The…"
9 hours ago
Eric Walters left a comment for Francisco José Ronco Poce
"GD '40 remains one of my favorite TCS games because one can see the stark differences between…"
13 hours ago
Francisco José Ronco Poce updated their profile
20 hours ago
Eric Walters left a comment for R.A.H.J. Damwijk
"R.A.H.J. -- Welcome to the CONSIMWORLD Social website!  You seem to have a preference for…"
Profile IconR.A.H.J. Damwijk and Roger Knowles joined ConsimWorld
Eric Walters left a comment for Roger Knowles
"Welcome to the CONSIMWORLD Social Website, Roger!  My mom grew up on the East Side (Cleveland…"
Dave Smith joined David JULIEN's group

Lock 'n Load

This is the place to discuss Lock 'n Load tactical system.See More
Dave Smith updated their profile




CSW Related Links

Please be sure to check-out these CSW services.

© 2019   Created by John Kranz.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service